[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [E-devel] E CVS: apps/e devilhorns



On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 07:56:15 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<raster@rasterman.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:24:31 -0500 brian.mattern@gmail.com babbled:
> 
> > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:15:49PM -0400, Christopher Michael wrote:
> > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > > > On Mon,  3 Jul 2006 03:35:44 -0400 (EDT) Enlightenment CVS
> > > > <noreply@fitx-00.ewr.caosity.org> babbled:
> > > > 
> > > > What was the reasoning for this? why would one need to pass the
> > > > path to an module icon explicitly? (if you want to do your own
> > > > icon in a dialog for a different dialog you can always do the
> > > > dialog by hand?)
> > > > 
> > 
> > <-- snip -->
> > 
> > > This was requested by Andy so that modules config dialogs could
> > > show their icon in the border of their config dialogs. I think
> > > consistency was his main goal and also so users can identify
> > > easily what config dialog is for what module.
> > > 
> > > If it is a problem I can roll it back and change the modules back
> > > to previous way of showing the E icon on the border of the config
> > > dialog.
> > > 
> > > dh
> > 
> > 
> > I *think* he meant that e already knows where the modules icon is,
> > so you you shouldn't need to pass th path in. That is, it should
> > just use the icon by default.
> 
> that's kind of what i was thinking - but then you would need to pass
> the module handle in - you need to pass something in at any rate so e
> can figure it out.

Void pointer called data, works everywhere else.  B-)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature