On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:30:57 -0700 Ben Rockwood <email@example.com> wrote: > In addition to just this, it'd be nice to roll the Get-E docs into a > proper document (DB XML) and add it to the official doc set, as well > as expand it as need be. Depending on the success of that document, > more user-level documentation might be appropriate. The current maintainer of the get-e documentation just left for a month and is probably uncontactable, although I suspect he will scrounge a net connection from somewhere. Personally, I have said from the beginning that I would like to get the FAQs into cvs in a form that can be used to generate the web site versions, and generate some sort of FAQs to distribute with the code. I don't know how possible it would be to generate XSM compatible data for the get-e web site from docbook source. I've never looked at using docbook.
Description: PGP signature