On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 19:52:18 -0500 Jesse Luehrs <jluehrs2@uiuc.edu> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 10:32:56 +1000 > David Seikel <onefang@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The mem and net modules slowly soak up the CPU cycles. I've been > > playing with it for hours, here is my findings, speculation, and > > wild ramblings. > > > > First, and most importantly, it's a very slow process. CPU will > > start at one percent, and slowly creep up to ten percent over an > > hour. > > I noticed this a few days and talked to devilhorns about it. He tested > it out, but didn't find anything. I've ran some more tests since then, > and it is almost definitely the graphs leaking memory. Having one of > cpu, net, and mem leaks slowly, two more quickly, and three within > about an hour or so. Disabling the graphs makes the issue disappear. The issue I'm tracking is a CPU cycle leak, not a memory leak. I think devilhorns fixed the memory leak.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature